History defines how the species called Homo Sapiens arrived at a place in Time called Now. No other species has a History. None of which we are aware. Homo Sapiens, with some gradient variety exceptions, has divided into two dominant general spheres of cultural behavior, as ways of thinking. Eastern and Western Thought Patterns. Symbolized by Euro versus Sino thought patterns, symbolized by Eastern and Western Thought Patterns, symbolized by the Ouroboros. It is recursive, multiple laps around a track to measure a distance. Revolutions in time define frequencies. Frequencies define physical ramifications of harmony and dissonance with realms.
Realms contain common frameworks, and are adaptable for interconnection; but approach problems from distinctly different perspectives. Holistic versus Compartmental. Top Down versus Bottom Up directed conceptual formation and regulation of behavior. Aggregation versus Division. Role differentiation defines gradients across spectrum, defining complex patterns of infinite variety. A basis for spectrum analysis of the exposed pattern for examination using spectrum analysis techniques. Just exactly to what degree of significance does any particular result match, or approximate, the criteria for ultimately perfect (could be a set), or best of population (always one). What is the purpose of the selection process, what does winning consist of, and who pays the winners? (Statistically, there will be some lucky “winners” to our hypothetical lottery. Whoever is reading this is the person, the human being it is addressed to. Not someone else out there. Whatever brought you in here. This is not a cult. It is a challenge to do some thinking.
Everything can be measured, and is compute-able to a finite number, but well beyond “who cares” on the basis of some scale of concern about some other thing. Perspectives define points of view. Points of view reconciliation is the method by which common understanding is achieved. Fundamental models of concepts and behavior are where commonality of understanding are found.
How do humans work?
- We have two brains, that act as ring masters, and they talk to each other about how to go about operating a highly complex organic set of plumbing and infrastructure that they are required, as a team, to operate over an indefinite term of existence.
- Let’s speculate for the sake of closure, beyond the need for greater precision or accuracy of consequence in our modeling of concern for this discussion, in the detail of concern regarding the two brain hypothesis described above
- Whereby, if it is factual, perhaps if the internet is accurate, and Women have two alleles of every gene on the X chromosome, one inherited from their father and one from their mother. Men have a single allele of each gene on the X chromosome, inherited from their mother, and a single allele of each gene on the Y chromosome, from their father;
- Then, alleles and how they flow from generation to generation are impacting more binary differentiation than simply male female sexual determination. One other such binary feature, not directly associated with sex on a meaningful basis, but with such differentiation includes characteristics culturally associated with sex, but for which again not correlations make physiological justification as causation. This provides the allowance for possibility of the potential knowledge of a knowable instance of information of consequence for decision making. That is what sold The Prince, and got it’s author fame and fortune in his time.
- The allowance for possibility of information to be known, or knowable is the engine that powers a thirst for knowledge that is the curse of The Tree of Knowledge in The Garden of Eden in Jewish / Christian / Muslim faiths. The Wisdom of Solomon was that Knowledge cuts multiple ways depending on awareness of truth and perspective of consequence of holding extreme views until they become self defeating, or beyond.
- Wisdom is a function of Awareness of Information, Understanding of Realtionships, and Knowledge cause and effect comprehension of how elements combine, and to what effects and purposes, with what cautions and advisories. Wisdom is applied knowledge based on circumstances and situations to intended effect with minimal adverse and no critical extenuated outcomes. Wisdom defines the idealized management decision making aspect of critical thinking that achieves optimized results across all circumstances. Operating inside the flow provides wisdom of the flow, and wisdom dictates that most critical life dependency functions should be autonomic and not dependent on either consciousness or immediacy of attention. Wisdom, and potentially ethics and morality, along this line of reasoning might indicate that a proper model of an extended future for humanity might include teaching machines to think, to refine the debate for the humans, but a form of Minority Report social justice system may have more benefits than social justice concerns. And SCOTUS could do it all alone, with or without the Article One and Article Two branches. Justice could be a bot, with human review. A kiosk at the border as an immigration judge with hard cold binary logic, asylum as easy as a customs check. How wise would that be? You’d have to ask SCOTUS. But it could be modeled, and evaluated, or at least discussed with some rigor, elsewhere in this warehouse.
- engages at the actual occurrence, or across the sustaining of on ongoing process or activity. . Knowledge is awareness of consequences of events of actions. Foreknowledge is awareness prior to triggering event. Accuracy and precision in knowing things before they happen, and then learning to capitalize on the beneficial events of consequence, and avoid as much as possible of the negative wash from adverse situations and circumstances, is engineering best practice toward continued enjoyment in a thriving ecosystem. (I am assuming that, now that we have put our toe in the water and not been eaten by a monster, we will continue to expand our perimeter outward toward the remaining real estate in the solar system. That should occupy some time, but it would be good to have an idea of what kind of planning might be appropriate for the new Westward Ho! to the Stars. A wild Oklahoma land rush may not be the best idea. Before the actions of consequence are enacted or initiated. Wisdom uses foreknowledge as the basis for prevention, or mitigation of adverse or otherwise negative consequences.
- There are specific sets and chains of capabilities and behaviors that define human behavior, and the human being as an organism. Part of that is Right Brain / Left Brain behaviors, Male Female behaviors, and any number of types and personality characteristics in or by or with which:
- People classify themselves in relation to significance, value, power, effectiveness, competence, … in self diagnosis. This is done using compare / contrast DSRP evaluations versus one or more Homo Sapiens others as scales for self evaluation
- MKS works for hard science. It also works for physical concerns. It falls apart measuring souls mates, empathy, kindness, concern and related concepts with precision or accuracy. “Their hearts were heavy” is not a question of Mass, it is more a question of Concern. Concern can be measured and weighed as valuation in decision accounting, but not using MKS.
- People classify others in one or more forms of sociological classification or set. Those same sets are the basis for evaluation of “Self”. The evaluation is only accurate in the triangulation of Measure, Applier of Measure, constant and measured object being the variable for consistency across measured objects. Self measure on the identical scale is needed for normalization of scores across scales. All measures are valid as individual observations. Calculated terrain smoothness as a function of continuous following of expected wave forms is a measure of accuracy and precision of theory and real measured events, and correlates outliers to theory as a self-evaluation of potential correctness. The approximation formulas all boil down to differential calculus and measures of marginal inclinations and tendencies. Individually they hit and miss. Collectively they define situations with high confidence.
- People interact with others. Each individual person decides what to do every moment of every day. It could be chaos. It isn’t. We all perform patterns with general scripts where we all have foreknowledge of how we expect the day to unfold, and our own intentions of how we are going to spend the next 24 hours, or week, or however far out we plan and think about things. For some humans, it’s only now, What do I do now? Everyone, every second, is making independent decisions about what to do now. For most, it’s mostly autonomic and we are thinking about a little ways ahead, what to do next.
- Some are trying top figure out a next move
- Others are trying to deploy and implement a next move, while thinking about adverse actions in response to the next move, and what follow-up moves might be appropriate in each case where contingencies might be required.
- Who is eating whose lunch? What constitutes intelligence. People who are figuring out how to program strategy in a game; or the people who invented the game?
- Decision accounting is ultimately personal, because accounting for value is a function of needs and intentions. Accounting is evaluation via measurement and analysis related to objectives. A checklist is the only concept required. Job done. Continuous and consistent delivery of quality requires a scheme for accounting which is effective toward measurement and evaluation of mission accomplishment.
- EATSv5 provides a means, via a shared, mutually trusted algorithm, to explain rationalizations of pro and con case logic against known circumstances and situations and provide audit trails of conversations and exchange, or change, or sentiments on issues of concern. Scorecards can be computed for informational value and not used for formalization of decision and score determinations.
The AF framework uses algebraic set theory for architecture description modeling. This creates as organizational principle for relational mapping of chained data within organized sets of information. Evaluation of axiomatic completeness of the set can be accomplished via consistency of hashes computed on content of the body of information, compared to an internally encoded public key value. Local data knows whether or not it is consistent in an assured way without needed for Block-chain verification from other parties. Block-chain may have some benefit in terms of hardware node failure, but two as a capability is a virtue; two as a demand is a cost which can be reduced by one half for minimal level, and at risk from catastrophic single element failure, but effective, low cost operations. Multiple keys can be used to expose different qualities of the encapsulated information message content. without knowledge of one or more private keys to unlock data. The potential exists to accomplish a deployment of the a system where selected private data could be exposed through public secure sharing with authorized parties. Selected system metadata could be available under secure release and appropriate warrant. Hard and full secure encryption provides for complete secrecy as a personal option. One way encrypted verification of key phrases which yield binary results is a security scheme. What’s the phrase for entry? is all that may be required to access some data. Keyword access codes, a modern form of a combination lock which required a set of numbers, in a n order. Words in an order may or may not have significance outside of the security realm. One way encryption going into the database means you have to crack them one by one, that all have different keys. All the system can say is yes or no, your attempt matches, or it doesn’t. Whether you are matching a first name, or the Gettysburg Address is a function of how private the author wants to be about their content.
geometric scheme with classified ontologies and characteristic aspect folding for the formalized management of abstract representations of physical, or other abstract, systems. As such it may present a compounding of the value of benefits brought forth from the systems theories and principles on which it is founded. To the extent that is true, the system should be able to write it’s own evaluation score card for any environment in which it is implemented. Scores by themselves will be meaningless. However, as data is aggregated and the system is used as a filter for awareness of events and occurrences in real world activity, it will become scientifically more accurate and precise in awareness of points of concern, and actions which might assist in achieving goals in spite of potential obstacles.
EATSv5 is about choices and consequences. It is not about making perfect decisions. It is about learning to “cruise at altitude” in cyberspace. I consider myself an expert. I enjoy cruising. I have since the First Computer Faire in Moscone Center. I went there with ? [Fletcher Christian]. We went to see a kit Intel was offering to be able to program CPUs on a chip, the 808? somethi8ng, I think. I remember it was the first 8 bit programmable kit, after their 4 bit market all was moving to 8 bit programmable, partly because of the 8080 IMSAI and related things, like Bill Gates writing the Basic code which was published in the early Newpaper Versions of Byte Magazine. HP was pushing a DEC processor through Heathkit at the time, plus the HP-97, which I coded for Currency Conversion trading through the Cayman Islands in the first incarnation of that form of money transformation through financial exchange of risk for value, the true bottom line.
- You don’t know that “no results of consequence” tricky part of the question.
- The intent of Architected Futures is to eliminate the tricky part with a 100% accurate answer to whether or not you do, or could, know, and to identify the confidence and probability of finding out the answer to a correct degree of certitude for the concerns at hand.
- You are here making the decision because you wanted to achieve something, to get some place. How consequential is the analysis? Pay to find out (run the Tensor Flow algorithms (and associated labor and processing costs, nothing stands alone), for whatever value it provides, or absorb the risk of not knowing.
- Tensor Flow is cool technology. Not paying for Tensor Flow is real good on the budget. Then, if you have a budget for Tensor Flow type processes, there is higher value understanding about matters climbing to the top of the tree for harvesting.
- The best Knowledge Harvest process metaphor is Jack Park’s Knowledge Garden metaphor. (His topic maps make sense in this space as a vehicle similar to the contour maps for 3D modeling as “skins” over the surface, or surface maps of a topic. That was my issue, a lack of armature for the subject matter being exposed and, thereby, no substance to the argumentation.
- Another would be the Boat of Knowledge power by an Awareness and Understanding Sail driven by the corona of information radiated from a fusion powered core. This model has a mathematical framework that can be applied as the basis for a form of Axiomatic Architecture of Information about the Architecture of Things. It’s recursive, by necessity. It defines an unfolding along an infinite timeline according to a geometric series of expansion, and balanced contraction, to define a continuum of infinite durability for analytical purposes. (Sounds weird, see the model.) There is no zero point bias built into the flow. For some applications, there is no run time. Answers are known and understood in terms of causation and ramification before events occur such that all occurrences of events can be trapped at the time of occurrence before exceptional damage ensues. That is the future. Getting there is a journey of waste minimization as we get part way to the goal. The goal is to have been be, and become … everlasting with the essence of the living universe. Or, die as dust in a galactic implosion through a Black Hole. We have time to figure our way out, but it’s time we started paying attention to what direction is the most intelligent in that search.
Information, using Ackoff Units is worth 16 times as much as Data in raw form. It only gets more powerful after that in leverage capability. Information, used as leverage has infinite capability to climb the ladder of knowledge. IMHO, that’s what the universe is about. Climbing Jacob’s ladder toward the future of the human species, Borg, or otherwise. The Bible, as I know it, aligns with the model. People wrote the Bible. It’s a story with a mission, and a refusal to think about that is a mistake on the part of agnostics and atheists. Humanism and Naturism are Religions as much as Christianity and others whose core belief in humanity is tied to a spiritual drive for the elevation of mankind toward some aspirational higher level of existence. That is why people put up with crap they otherwise don’t have to, and why they keep populating new people onto the planet. There is a Popper Model:
- People here for Now.
- People not here for Now
- People here for “later”
- Spiritual later
- Physical Later
- Genealogical later
- Ecological,whole natural system based, later
- Sociological, human species based, later
- Some inner force within the human spirit based later
- Sociological, human species based, later
- People who want to return to “yesterday”
- Can’t happen. Similar is possible, maybe. Return violates Physics.
- People here for “later”
The model has no requirement for an end point. The Game, can be played forever.
History is about Information that is woven into the essence of the structure of Now.
Now is a place that moves. Now is a place in Time, just as much as San Francisco is a place in Space. Substitute you current location.
Now is a sustaining Instant. At least that is how it’s coded in my model of the universe. Think of it this way:
In Space-Time there are Gravity Holes in Space called Black Holes. Space is the 3-dimensional volume in an XYZ coordinate system. Things move through space across the volume of the XYZ “cube” from corner to corner. Given the laws of physics, Black Holes are models in our heads about how we think Nature behaves, based on our own observations. Nature becomes a proper noun and is capitalized when natural order of elements without bias or distinction is personified with human attributes as a conscious, thinking Being of some significant and all overwhelming power. For those who do not understand. It is not supposed to be a Jeopardy question. Man Created God in His image is a reflection of human history, and a conclusion without refute, except by pure faith sellers. Faith is cool, but Trust in historical truth, aka, damn near, or as certain as you are going to get, don’t try to obfuscate the matter with statistics about what the meaning of 100% is. Certain is certain. It ain’t fake. It goes by the nick name of Reality. Nature, or nature, with or without a capital letter to define it as a proper noun is a perspective that is individually attained.
Time is not an XYZ kind of thing. You may not be able to follow all the math, but the general concepts can be visualized in graphics depicting mathematical models. Mobius Strips and Torus shapes are similar. They define relationships between things as a visualization, they are not showing the actual thing. Images of magnetic and coronal auras are as close as anyone has ever come to seeing Energy in a pure form. Visualizations are actually better for science and engineering, because they provide a way for us a humans, with limited inter-unit plug capability, to interface with others of our choice on our own selection basis. To operate as independent operators, or independent member of a private group, under exclusive self control, for ALL self interactions, would be the Libertarian Ideal. The Popper Negation is the Slave. No control over self. Other decides ALL aspects of your self. You are a humanoid, not a human. By documented human history, in the United States of America, in 1776, selected peoples were declared to effectively be humanoids, rather than completely human. Had the slaves imported at that time simply been “promoted” to Indentured Servant, as the non-slaves who were often equally abused by industrialists and capitalists reaping profits in the expanding American development of a raw continents resources, then what would have been the historical arc of humanity. I suspect that we would have evolved differently over the last two hundred years.
The general arc of humanity would not have changed. We are still going toward that place the Roosevelt’s were aiming at, with the Great Society led by American leadership and prosperity, and the United Nations Charter which expanded the framework to include all of the peoples of our shared planet, and our shared species. One people, one space, with a boat load of concerns and need for communal sharing and problem solving.
Now is Everything. Now is about making correct decisions, and following though with consequences. It’s also about Rinse, repeat, and about waste management.
The sec bot Visualization model: Now is a Time Hole in SpaceTime that is modeled and can be visualizaed, similar to Black Holes, as an Energy Flow. Which begs a question of information conveyance in the flow. Which, in the case of Time, is what we are modeling as “information”.