- AF WP Workbench
- EATS Library
- PDSS Concept Map
- WP SKOS Facilities
SARL Architected Futures™ [today format='Y-m-d H:i']
The introduction of Bloom’s Taxonomy into the suite of integrated models was triggered by JVS finding post in 2021 which was dated a number of years earlier on an educational blog.
Tara Kostecki has an interesting post reflecting on Bloom’s Taxonomy with a pair of distinctive viewpoints created by reflecting on the concepts exposed in the taxonomy using a noun-verb distinctive comparison, and a reflective ladder of questions used in the practice of education for humans developed by Peter Pappas.
[advanced_iframe src=”https://tecki2016.wordpress.com/2018/08/07/a-taxonomy-of-reflection-pappas-2010/” width=”100%” height=”600″]
The Reflective Question
IF the trend to the future is toward a society of cooperative, meaningful work for all peoples
Adapted from wikipedia
Bloom’s taxonomy is a set of three hierarchical models used to classify educational learning objectives into levels of complexity and specificity. The three lists cover the learning objectives in cognitive, affective and sensory domains. The cognitive domain list has been the primary focus of most traditional education and is frequently used to structure curriculum learning objectives, assessments and activities.
The models were named after Benjamin Bloom, who chaired the committee of educators that devised the taxonomy. He also edited the first volume of the standard text, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.